Instant Play Framework Starter


Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Instant Play Framework Starter file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Instant Play Framework Starter book. Happy reading Instant Play Framework Starter Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Instant Play Framework Starter at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Instant Play Framework Starter Pocket Guide.
Reward Yourself

If the app was simple enough and I was feeling up for a challenge than maybe just Erlang directly with Cowboy so no real framework. For the front end: Elm or maybe Ember. I started learning Elm this year too and like it but I possibly would go Ember because it seems interesting and since I have a membership to Daily Drip I have free tutorials on Ember as well as Elm and Elixir. Django if front end is complex lots of forms, complicated templating, need to have a free admin interface for out of the box.

To make it more maintainable, I'd probably split the application into two components, so backend could be API written in Go and front end a Django app. After significant React experience I can no longer tolerate send-html-template-sprinkle-javascript stacks. The downside is that the amount of boilerplate is unbearable. There's significant friction in the tooling because of transpiling, sourcemaps, multiple layers of sourcemaps, file watching, having to produce multiple different bundles for server side rendering, client-side bundle and so on, testing with transpiling is a pain, test coverage with transpiling is at times borderline impossible, proper isomorphic data-loading is difficult and the list goes on.

Still prefer it to the other stuff. Xeoncross on May 22, This is often a deal-breaker for smaller projects where the whole team is not used to all the tooling. Even if they are extremely familiar with the tooling it's still a huge problem. People get seduced by unrealistic examples online and think "oh easy just drop this little config thing here and done". The problem is the little things pile up on top of each other before you know for a production app you are deep into plugins and transpilers and configs to your knees and you have to make them all play with each other.

Just some examples of difficulties of this architecture, - You must have an API for doing anything because the client-side needs the API, but on the server you also have to use the same code for server side rendering. It gets more fun because you have to deal with authentication as well on both sides. So you will have to "proxy" the cookies from the client on the server side to the API to load initial data for server side rendering. This is full of gotchas and largely undocumented it will take you at least multiple days to get right.

At what point do you fire ajax calls to load data for the destination? Sometimes multiple calls are needed. With react router you'll need a custom "Link" component with data loading functions that produce promises then you can do Promise. For a good experience you have to incorporate timeouts. In my case I immediately start loading target data upon link click for navigation, wait up to ms "navigation wait tolerance" and if things are not done by then I navigate to the target in a loading state and the page re-renders when data is loaded or error happens and error is displayed.

Again, full of gotchas. This is a minefield if you don't want to be leaking your admin UI and capabilities. At this point you will need to have a separate admin bundle that is not given to normal users.

Instant Play Framework Starter (eBook) | Products in | Ebooks, Starters

Good luck with that. You can't just "add" it on top of the normal bundle too hard to explain, try it and you'll find out. So it needs to be a complete application bundle that is built for admins. But well if you want the admins to go through the normal login page like all the other users So you have to have another "test" bundle that imports all the tests, you have to transpile and build that bundle then execute it with a test runner.

At this point all the usual tools for test coverage become nearly unusable. These problems will interact with each other in complex ways you can't just solve them separately one by one. Each one you try to fix will create other compromises or problems in another area. And with all of this bullshit I still prefer this to the old er way of jQuery event handlers and so on. At some point I got so fed up with the problems I described earlier I tried to go back to the old stuff but I couldn't tolerate it anymore so I came back and accepted the new nonsense.

Mind you it has improved a lot since the last year as well. Especially with the newer versions of React Router. Turtles all the way down :. I guess I'm just old and cranky anymore :. It feels like trying to start a fire with a stick when you have a lighter in your pocket. But as I said the boilerplate and friction is still unbearable.


  1. Upgrading to Play 2: Anorm and Testing?
  2. Join Kobo & start eReading today.
  3. MODERATORS.
  4. Browse more videos.
  5. The Montauk Steps.
  6. Summer of the Wolves.

I think there is just one sane choice: I'd use the one that I know best, and the one that has huge number of users which means it's more battle tested. There are pros and cons for each.

React: once you get the framework down, it's a lot easier to build a native mobile app with React Native. There's no Angular Native. Angular: powerful and abundant. A little different, but flexible. Answers on SO for every little thing that will come up to ask.

Browse Search

Not sure if newer frameworks will have that same luxury. Rails: a lot of convention. But once you get it down, you'll be able to build complex apps in little time. Also a lot of community support and search engine presence. If it helps, I've open-sourced all code around Standard Notes.

I still prefer React Native overall as more people are using it and the ecosystem is bigger, but using Nativescript with Angular was surprisingly pleasant when I first tried it out a few weeks ago. If I was to start a project today it would be Elixir using cowboy and plug. I like to keep things simple. If I thought the project was more on the medium size I would probably use Asp. Net Core. Postgres for my database needs. Speed and flexibility of development although tbh this is just about what you're used to , using the same language on both ends, and I really like js.

Express is also a framework. Not really, you could make that argument about any set of technologies working in tandem. Traditionally a framework is an entire set of technologies, only really designed to work together e. Express is a routing library for handling HTTP requests, it's not opinionated about anything else. It does one thing, and it does it fairly well.

React is a library for building UI components. It's not particularly opinionated on how you manage your data, or anything else really. It just renders things, and helps you do this efficiently. Redux is a library for managing state changes in an application. It doesn't tell you how to render these changes, it just manages state.

These are not frameworks, they're focussed libraries.

Download Instant Play Framework Starter ebook {PDF} {EPUB}

Backend: Django as soon as you want an admin interface for your models. It just saves so much time, and nobody enjoys writing those dumb CRUD routes. If you don't need an admin interface and want to stay in Python, I'd recommend Flask. Else I'm also enjoying Node. Frontend: Vue. Backend: Django Python 3. Yes flask might be lighter etc, but at the end of the day, when you need to do things quick, batteries included approach goes a long way.

Also, it will be easier to find developers who can hit the ground running. Database: PostgreSQL 9. That's easy. You get the best of all worlds here. Stable, fast. There is no other choice for me. Front end: Depends.

I prefer to use Semantic-UI the React port is excellent for the presentation. I now try to avoid all-in frameworks which tie you in like a Catholic marriage. Source control and Project Management: Git and Github. Specialised system apps - Go lang. For fast specialised servers, websockets, etc. Bonus points: Personal Development: Learn a new language every year.

Do a little project in it. Rails: stable ecosystem, just heroku it. The selection is because of rails or heroku? It's easy to develop and also to deploy, which is something you want in a project.

Writing your first Scala.js programs

Other: the one you're most familiar with If you're starting up a new project, choosing the "best" framework vs the one you're most familiar with is going to make everything that much more difficult. You're going to learn something before you can build something? And build something more slowly because you're trying to learn something? My current stack: Backend: Go standard library mostly, httprouter, and some homegrown libraries for stuff like dependency injection, configuration etc.

I really like Elixir. It's probably been a good warmup for testing microservices.

Instant Play Framework Starter Instant Play Framework Starter
Instant Play Framework Starter Instant Play Framework Starter
Instant Play Framework Starter Instant Play Framework Starter
Instant Play Framework Starter Instant Play Framework Starter
Instant Play Framework Starter Instant Play Framework Starter
Instant Play Framework Starter Instant Play Framework Starter

Related Instant Play Framework Starter



Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved